Re: [SQL] OUTER JOINS
От | Herouth Maoz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] OUTER JOINS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | l03130305b34cd633efee@[147.233.159.109] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] OUTER JOINS (Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
At 16:26 +0300 on 19/04/1999, Dan Janowski wrote: > Thanks for giving it a stab. Looking at the available > operators, > there is no =* or *= ops available. Although I am curious > where it > comes from. To the best of my knowledge, outer joins are not yet supported in PostgreSQL. As far as I recall, you can achieve the same effect with a union. For example, if you have a people table and a pets table, where each person's pet is joined to the owner by the owner's id colum, you'll theoretically do something like: SELECT surname, firstname, pet_name FROM people, pets WHERE id *= owner_id ORDER BY surname, firstname; So instead, you'll have to do something like: SELECT surname, firstname, pet_name FROM people, pets WHERE id = owner_id UNION SELECT surname, firstname, null FROM peopleWHERE not exist ( SELECT 1 FROM pets WHERE owner_id = id ) ORDER BY surname, firstname; Excuse me if I goofed something syntactically, I don't have time to actually create the tables and test the above. Note, however, that a UNION removes duplicates. Herouth -- Herouth Maoz, Internet developer. Open University of Israel - Telem project http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: